Economics | 3 min read | September 2025

What Effect Will China's Stock Market Rally Have on the Economy?

The recent stock market rally should have a limited expansionary impact on China’s real economic growth

  • The tight regulatory grip and a low proportion of stock holdings on household balance sheets limit the wealth and income effects brought by the stock rally
  • China should avoid high-profile monetary easing measures in the near term and focus on revitalizing its property sector and addressing deep-rooted structural problems
  • Nomura economists maintain expectations of a 10bp policy rate cut and a 50bp RRR cut in Q4

While China's stock markets have reached decade-highs, Nomura economists question whether this rally can meaningfully boost the country’s growth outlook. The previous stock market bull run China experienced a decade ago was unable to provide a meaningful boost to the real economy, and our economists expect even less of an expansionary effect this time.

The boom and bust in 2014-15

In 2014-15, China’s stock markets experienced a dramatic boom and bust cycle. From mid-2014 to mid-2015, the Shanghai Composite Index (SCI) skyrocketed by around 150%, driven by a speculative frenzy among millions of retail investors. However, after the euphoria peaked in mid-June of 2015, the bubble popped by the end of the same month. Major aftershocks occurred in July and August, with the SCI plummeting by over 40% from its peak.

A review of major economic indicators suggests the impact of the stock rally on the real economy was rather limited, with the exception of an increase in financial sector GDP, which was significantly boosted by buoyant stock trading. Retail sales growth in four tier-1 cities weakened in H1 2015 in comparison with that in 2014, indicating the stock market gains did not translate into an increase in consumption. A reason behind the limited wealth effect is the small portion of stock assets on household balance sheets, accounting for only 1.3% of total assets.

Regulators’ tight grip limits the income effect even further

As China’s financial markets regulatory environment has now become more stringent, the benefit accrued from the rally could be significantly less than a decade ago. The tight regulatory grip on IPOs could limit wealth creation prospects for entrepreneurs and investors, while the decrease in broker commission fees and a broad-based salary cap on financial practitioners limit their potential incomes. Therefore, we believe the impact of buoyed trading volumes on the financial sector could be much smaller today than in 2014-15.

Housing markets in major financial hubs might also benefit little, as housing demand is now much less than it was a decade ago. After more than four years of an unprecedented property slump, homebuyers' and investors’ confidence in China’s housing prices has dampened.

The policy dilemma

The ongoing stock rally should have a limited expansionary effect on China’s real economy, and the government should not rely on it to boost slowing growth. As retail investors pile into trading and the media talk up the bull market, it could potentially lead to a rise in irrational exuberance, an increase in leverage and the formation of another bubble. This puts Beijing in a policy dilemma, as high-profile easing measures such as policy rate and RRR cuts could fan the flames but doing nothing risks worsening the country’s slowdown.

In our view, the best strategy Beijing could adopt now is to remain vigilant by avoiding high-profile or contractionary policies, focus on cleaning up the property sector and addressing the country’s deep-rooted problems, such as the unequal social security system. Beijing may consider stepping up its stimulus measures to provide a boost to the economy when the stock market enthusiasm cools. We see little chance of the People's Bank of China cutting policy rates in September, and we continue to expect a 10bp policy rate cut and a 50bp RRR cut in Q4, though the exact timing is unknown.

Read more of our China views here and here.

Tags In

Contributors

Ting Lu

Chief China Economist

Jing Wang

Asia Economist

Hannah Liu

China Economist

Harrington Zhang

China Economist

Disclaimer

This content has been prepared by Nomura solely for information purposes, and is not an offer to buy or sell or provide (as the case may be) or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell or enter into any agreement with respect to any security, product, service (including but not limited to investment advisory services) or investment. The opinions expressed in the content do not constitute investment advice and independent advice should be sought where appropriate.The content contains general information only and does not take into account the individual objectives, financial situation or needs of a person. All information, opinions and estimates expressed in the content are current as of the date of publication, are subject to change without notice, and may become outdated over time. To the extent that any materials or investment services on or referred to in the content are construed to be regulated activities under the local laws of any jurisdiction and are made available to persons resident in such jurisdiction, they shall only be made available through appropriately licenced Nomura entities in that jurisdiction or otherwise through Nomura entities that are exempt from applicable licensing and regulatory requirements in that jurisdiction. For more information please go to https://www.nomuraholdings.com/policy/terms.html.